Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review
https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr
<p>Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review was established in 2021 by Multidisciplinary Publishing Institute (SMC-Private) Limited [MDPIP] and is a multidisciplinary journal for research in health and medical sciences, public health, health services management, health informatics, biological sciences, pharmaceutical sciences, chemistry, and many more related disciplines. In 2024-2025, the journal has been recognised by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) in the "Y" category. It is a biannual journal publishing 2 issues with a broad-spectrum double-blind peer review and open-access policy. The journal is internationally indexed. MDPIP Journals publishes original research papers, review articles, communications, invited reviews, commentaries, and research notes that conform to the scope and editorial standards. To further the process, the journal is using an online journal management system. Authors are required to submit manuscripts online. The journal follows APA format and references. It strictly follows the scientific research standards for publication from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Medical Association (WMA). The journal is using LOCKSS and CLOCKSS for digital archiving.</p> <p><strong>Editor-in-Chief: </strong> Professor Dr. Bahadar Shah</p> <p><strong>Executive Editor:</strong> Dr. Adhir Sharma</p> <p><strong>Technical Editor: </strong> Dr. Qamar Afaq Qureshi</p> <p><strong>Short Title:</strong> Open Access Pub. Health & Health Admin. Rev.</p> <p><strong>ISSN [online]: </strong> 2959-6203</p> <p><strong>ISSN [print]:</strong> 2959-619X</p> <p><strong>DOI Prefix: </strong>10.59644</p> <p><strong>MODE:</strong> Open Access</p> <p><strong>PUBLICATION FREQUENCY:</strong> Biannual</p> <p><strong>ARTICLE PROCESSING TIME:</strong> Four Weeks</p> <p><strong>PUBLICATION POLICY:</strong> Desk review, editorial review, double-blind peer review, acceptance letter/rejection letter (final decision to accept/reject is the prerogative of the editor-in-chief).</p> <p><strong>AIMS AND SCOPE</strong></p> <p><strong>Journal Mission and Purpose</strong></p> <p>Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access multidisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing knowledge, practice, and policy across the interrelated fields of public health, epidemiology, health management, healthcare governance, and medical sciences. The journal’s overarching mission is to bridge the gap between public health empirical research, administrative management strategies, and real-world health policy execution. By publishing innovative, methodologically sound, and ethically grounded research, the journal aims to inform policy decisions, enhance health system performance, address health inequities, and promote global population well-being.</p> <p><strong>Core Subject Areas and Scope</strong></p> <p>The journal considers original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, policy analyses, short communications, and case studies across the following key domains:</p> <ol> <li><strong> Public Health Practice, Policy, Medical Sciences, and Epidemiology</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>Environmental, occupational, and global public health.</li> <li>Infectious and chronic disease epidemiology, surveillance, and prevention.</li> <li>Infectious (communicable) diseases, noncommunicable (chronic) diseases, hereditary (genetic) disorders, deficiency or physiological, and zoonotic diseases.</li> <li>Social determinants of health, health disparities, and health equity.</li> <li>Maternal, child, adolescent, and reproductive health interventions.</li> <li>Planetary health, climate change, and public health resilience.</li> <li>Preventive, curative, promotive, rehabilitative, and palliative health.</li> <li>Nursing, pharmaceutics, and veterinary science and medicines.</li> </ul> <ol start="2"> <li><strong> Health Administration, Healthcare Leadership, and Governance</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>Strategic management, organizational behavior, and leadership in healthcare institutions.</li> <li>Health system governance, public sector management, and health reform implementation.</li> <li>Human resources for health, operational management, and administrative efficiency.</li> <li>Quality improvement, patient safety, and clinical governance in hospital and community settings.</li> </ul> <ol start="3"> <li><strong>Health Economics, Financing, and Policy Evaluation</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>Health economics, economic evaluation, and cost-effectiveness analysis of public health interventions.</li> <li>Healthcare financing systems, insurance mechanisms, resource allocation, and universal health coverage (UHC) strategies.</li> <li>Policy synthesis, health impact assessments (HIA), and legislative analyses in global and national health frameworks.</li> </ul> <ol start="4"> <li><strong> Health Technology, Informatics, and Digital Health Management</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>Digital health governance, electronic health records (EHR), and health information systems (HIS).</li> <li>Application of artificial intelligence (AI), big data, and predictive analytics in public health and administrative decision-making.</li> <li>Telemedicine implementation, evaluation, and operational ethics.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Target Audience</strong></p> <p>The journal serves a global scholarly and professional community, including:</p> <ul> <li>Public health researchers, epidemiologists, and academics.</li> <li>Healthcare managers, chief executive officers, and hospital administrators.</li> <li>Health policy analysts, government officials, and policymakers.</li> <li>Public health practitioners, community health advocates, and international agency representatives (e.g., WHO, UNICEF).</li> </ul> <p><strong>Indexing Alignment Statements</strong></p> <p>To comply with the quantitative and qualitative editorial selection requirements of scientific publications, the journal adheres strictly to the following parameters:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Editorial Independence and Diversity:</strong> Managed by an international Editorial Board composed of recognized experts with demonstrated publication records across diverse geographical regions.</li> <li><strong>Rigorous Peer Review:</strong> All submissions undergo a double-blind peer review process by independent subject matter experts.</li> <li><strong>Publication Ethics:</strong> Adheres to the core guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).</li> <li><strong>International Content and Standards:</strong> Requires all articles to have a title, abstract, and keywords written in clear English, with cited literature formatted in Roman script.</li> <li><strong>Regularity and Quality:</strong> Operates on a regular publishing schedule, providing persistent Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) at the article level and complete online metadata.</li> </ul> <p><strong>PUBLISHING DISCIPLINES:</strong> Health and Medical Sciences, Organization, Management, Leadership, and Technology; eHealth, mHealth, and EHR; Public Health; Epidemiology; Communicable Diseases; Infection Control; Digital Health; Health Informatics; Health Management; Health Economics and Financial Management; Health Insurance; Health Policy and Planning; Environmental Health and Sustainability; Patient Safety; Health Quality Management; Global Health; Physical Health; Nursing and Patient Care; Sports Medicine; Biological Sciences; Biochemistry; Biotechnology; Pharmaceuticals; Agriculture; Fisheries; and Veterinary Sciences.</p> <p><strong>PUBLISHER: </strong> https://www.mdpip.com</p> <p><strong>RECOGNITION: </strong>Pakistan Medical & Dental Council (PM&DC) [evaluation in process]</p> <p><strong>RECOGNITION: </strong>Web of Science (WoS) [2nd round evaluation in process]</p> <p> </p>Multidisciplinary Publisishing Institute (SMC-Private) Limiteden-USOpen Access Public Health and Health Administration Review2959-619XMapping SDG Synergies: Digitalization, Sustainable Development Goals, and Evolving Patient Expectations in Modern Healthcare
https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/article/view/300
<p>The contemporary global healthcare landscape is undergoing an unprecedented paradigm shift driven by rapid technological innovation and shifting population demographics. As health systems worldwide strive to fulfill the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—most notably SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages—the integration of digital tools has transitioned from an optional enhancement to a core structural necessity. Modern healthcare delivery is no longer defined solely by clinical interactions within physical facilities; rather, it operates at a dynamic intersection where artificial intelligence (AI), mobile health applications, electronic health record (EHR) ecosystems, and remote patient monitoring converge. This digital transformation brings profound opportunities alongside critical vulnerabilities. While digital tools improve healthcare accessibility and structural efficiency, they also alter patient behaviors, driving new expectations for convenience, transparency, and personal agency. For health researchers, clinicians, and policymakers, understanding the interplay among the SDGs, the digitalization of health systems, and shifting patient expectations is vital for designing equitable, sustainable, and high-quality care frameworks. By focusing scholarship on these intersections, the scientific community can ensure that digital transformations strengthen equitable, sustainable, and patient-centered health systems worldwide.</p>Kesavan Sreekantan Nair
Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2026-08-242026-08-245110.59644/oaphhar.5(1).300An Empirical Study on the Prevalence and Multidrug Resistance Profiles of Salmonella and Campylobacter Species: A One Health Context
https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/article/view/298
<p>Salmonella and Campylobacter are foodborne pathogens that pose public health risks, particularly in commercial poultry production, where antimicrobial resistance may compromise the treatment of infected birds and undermine food safety. The present cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence, antimicrobial resistance profile, and multidrug resistance (MDR) pattern of Salmonella and Campylobacter in commercial broiler farms of Punjab, Pakistan. Samples (ecal contents, cloacal swabs, bootsocks, and fecal grabs) were taken from 70 farms, with a total of 350 samples collected and processed by microbiological and molecular techniques. The overall Salmonella prevalence was 22.0% (77 samples were positive), and the overall Campylobacter prevalence was 34.0% (119 samples were positive). Campylobacter prevalence was also found to be highest in bootsocks (48.6%), whereas the prevalence of Salmonella was highest in bootsocks (31.4%). The highest prevalence of both pathogens was found on small farms. The highest resistance level was seen for Salmonella isolates against tetracycline (80.5%) and nalidixic acid (71.4%), and 61.0% were considered MDR. The antimicrobial resistance rate for Campylobacter was high for tetracycline (89.1%), ciprofloxacin (81.5%), and nalidixic acid (76.5%), and the MDR rate was 93.3%. Pathogen prevalence was significantly associated with farm size, antimicrobial use, and biosecurity. These findings indicate a threat from One Health and underscore the importance of better biosecurity, responsible use of antimicrobials, surveillance, and targeted interventions for commercial broiler production.</p>Muhammad Talha AzizSadaf SultanaRabiya SultanaMuhammad Saad YousafSyed Muhammad Sibtain ShahMadiha HassanAyesha TariqIeman TariqShafiq Ur Rehman
Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2026-08-262026-08-265112210.59644/oaphhar.5(1).298Investigating the Confounding Role of Artificial Intelligence on the Relationship between Patient Safety and Infection Control Practices in Enhancing Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/article/view/299
<p>This study aimed to investigate how AI mediates the relationship between infection control, patient safety, and patient satisfaction. The study used an exploratory sequential research design with two phases. In the first phase, 25 qualitative studies were analyzed using PRISMA (2009–2024), which were supplemented by quantitative analysis of 384 samples. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among physicians, nurses, and paramedics. The scales were found to be reliable and valid in PLS-SEM measurement models. The structural model was run to investigate the direct and indirect effects. The result suggests the significant direct effect of AI and infection control on satisfaction. However, patient safety and satisfaction were found to be insignificant. This implies full mediation by AI between Patient safety and satisfaction. AI's mediating role was confirmed between safety, infection control, and satisfaction. The study concludes that themes emerged from the review of the studies, and the findings of the quantitative data were consistent. Hence, this study validates the results of previous studies in the context of the Middle East. Through triangulation, the diverse sources used in this study have reduced bias, reinforced internal validity, and provided a deep insight into the mediating effect of AI in enhancing patient safety, infection control, and patient satisfaction. The significant role of experience and staff categories emphasizes the need for targeted interventions and training to foster a culture of safety and technological adoption across healthcare roles. Healthcare policymakers should consider these factors when implementing new technologies and designing training programs to ensure the benefits of AI, infection control, and patient safety.</p>Ghulam Muhammad KundiTanya Marie TorresSyed Arif Pasha
Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2026-08-302026-08-3051234110.59644/oaphhar.5(1).299Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine: A Cross-Sectional Study
https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/article/view/289
<p>Typhoid fever remains a serious public health problem in Pakistan especially with the advent of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains of Salmonella Typhi. Introduction of typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV) into the Expanded Programme on Immunization in Pakistan is a historic preventive intervention but its success will depend on the perception and acceptance of the population. The survey was a national cross-sectional web-based survey that was conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 and included the general population of Pakistan. A total of 918 participants were included (mean age: 25.9 ± 9.6 years; 51.0% female). While general knowledge regarding vaccination was high, only 54.2% were aware of TCV and 52.1% knew about government-led TCV campaigns. Most respondents perceived TCV as safe (77.7%) and effective (80.8%), and 91.8% supported mandatory vaccination programs. Booster dose acceptance was high (83.1%). Higher household income was positively associated with booster willingness (aOR = 2.85, p < 0.001), while negative attitudes toward vaccine efficacy significantly reduced acceptance (aOR = 0.20, p = 0.011). Notwithstanding the positive attitude towards the TCV, the gaps in the awareness and the lack of optimal vaccination habits are still present. Different health-educational interventions and communication strategies should be considered to enhance better vaccine coverage and maintain long-term control of typhoid in Pakistan.</p>Muhammad Dawood Khan
Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2026-09-142026-09-1451426110.59644/oaphhar.5(1).289