https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/issue/feed Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review 2026-04-05T05:44:17+00:00 Dr. Bahadar Shah chiefeditor@mdpip.com Open Journal Systems <p>Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review was established in 2021 by Multidisciplinary Publishing Institute (SMC-Private) Limited [MDPIP] and is a multidisciplinary journal for research in public health, health services management, health informatics, biological sciences, pharmaceutical sciences, chemistry, and many more related disciplines. The journal is recognized by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) in the "Y" category. It is a biannual journal publishing 2 issues with a broad-spectrum double-blind peer review and open access policy. The journal is internationally indexed. MDPIP Journals publishes original research papers, review articles, communications, invited reviews, commentaries, and research notes that conform to the scope and editorial standards. To further the process, the journal is using an online journal management system. Authors are required to submit manuscripts online. The journal follows APA format and references. It strictly follows the scientific research standards for publication from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Medical Association (WMA). The journal is using LOCKSS and CLOCKSS for digital archiving.</p> <p><strong>Editor-in-Chief: </strong> Professor Dr. Bahadar Shah</p> <p><strong>Executive Editor:</strong> Professor Dr. Fahd M. Albejaidi</p> <p><strong>Technical Editor: </strong> Dr. Qamar Afaq Qureshi</p> <p><strong>Short Title:</strong> Open Access Pub. Health &amp; Health Admin. Rev.</p> <p><strong>ISSN [online]: </strong> 2959-6203</p> <p><strong>ISSN [print]:</strong> 2959-619X</p> <p><strong>DOI Prefix: </strong>10.59644</p> <p><strong>MODE:</strong> Open Access</p> <p><strong>PUBLICATION FREQUENCY:</strong> Biannual</p> <p><strong>ARTICLE PROCESSING TIME:</strong> Four Weeks</p> <p><strong>PUBLICATION POLICY:</strong> Desk Review, Editorial review, Double-Blind Peer Review, Acceptance Letter/Rejection Letter</p> <p><strong>SCOPE:</strong> Organization, Management, Leadership, and Technology; eHealth, mHealth, and EHR; Public Health; Epidemiology; Communicable Diseases; Infection Control; Digital Health; Health Informatics; Health Management; Health Economics and Financial Management; Health Insurance; Health Policy and Planning; Environmental Health and Sustainability; Patient Safety; Health Quality Management; Global Health; Physical Health; Nursing and Patient Care; Sports Medicine; Biological Sciences; Biochemistry; Biotechnology; Pharmaceuticals; Agriculture; Fisheries; and Veterinary Sciences.</p> <p><strong>RECOGNITION: </strong>Higher Education Commission of Pakistan in "Y" Category</p> <p>https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/services/faculty/journals/Pages/default.aspx </p> <p><strong>RECOGNITION: </strong>Pakistan Medical &amp; Dental Council (PM&amp;DC) [evaluation in process]</p> <p> </p> https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/article/view/268 Navigating the Precipice: Global Healthcare Challenges and the Path Toward Sustainable Quality Care in 2026 2026-04-05T05:44:17+00:00 Ghulam Muhammad Kundi g.muhammad@qu.edu.sa <p>As we navigate the second quarter of 2026, the global healthcare landscape stands at a critical juncture. The promise of the "digital decade" has met the harsh reality of demographic shifts, economic volatility, and a strained global workforce. While the tools at our disposal—ranging from generative AI (GenAI) to precision genomics—are more advanced than ever, the structural integrity of health systems in both developed and developing nations is being tested to its limits. This editorial examines the divergent yet overlapping challenges facing these regions and proposes a rigorous framework for administrative reform to ensure quality care remains a fundamental human right.&nbsp;The challenges of 2026 provide a unique opportunity for a global reset. The divide between developed and developing nations is narrowing; both are realizing that the current trajectory is unsustainable. Quality care in this decade will be defined by how well we support our workforce, how securely we guard our data, and how equitably we distribute the fruits of medical innovation.</p> 2026-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/article/view/266 Knowledge and Attitude Practices Regarding Eye Donation among University Students of Lahore: A Cross-Sectional Institution-Based Study 2026-03-15T03:22:11+00:00 Kashaf Sajid kashafsajid40@gmail.com Mehak Sarwar romansarwar555@gmail.com Fariha Shahzadi farihashahzadi15@gmail.com Syed Muhammad Yaseen yaseensyedmuhammad07@gmail.com Umair Wazir umairwazir40@gmail.com Ali Akhtar aliakhtar5657@gmail.com <p>This is a cross-sectional study that evaluated the awareness, knowledge, and attitudes towards eye donation among 1,200 health faculty students in Lahore, Pakistan. A self-administered structured questionnaire was used to collect data related to demographic data, academic background, and questions that assessed knowledge and perceptions on eye donation. The responses were interpreted using descriptive statistical analysis. According to the results, 68% of respondents were aware of eye donation, with 29.5% and 26.8% of participants having friends or family and social media as the main sources of information, respectively. But there were only 37.7% of respondents who were willing to donate their eyes after death. The majority of students revealed poor knowledge in the technical side of the eye donor practice, about 54.45% of the students portrayed positive views, whereas 45.6% portrayed negative views. These results demonstrate the existence of a significant disconnection between positive perception and sufficient knowledge among health faculty students. It was found that despite the awareness, the lack of technical knowledge is a potential problem that may impede the advocacy of eye donation. Limitations are due to the cross-sectional nature and the use of self-reported responses that can impact the generalizability. The results highlight the importance of specific educational interventions, curriculum consolidation, and sensitization in the health institutions to improve the knowledge and promote the practice of eye donation. Future studies need to be conducted with bigger and multi-institutional samples to assess the impact of educational interventions on enhancing awareness and intentions to donate their corneas.</p> 2026-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review https://journal.mdpip.com/index.php/oapr/article/view/264 The Quantitative Text Analysis of China's Elderly Care Policy Texts Based on the PMC Model 2026-03-03T08:55:45+00:00 Zhang Qingson 1804629945@qq.com Wei Lai weilaichn@aliyun.com Zhao Lei 1132796015@qq.com Tian Renfeng 1668053083@qq.com <p>Against the backdrop of accelerating population aging in China, the scientific optimization of elderly care policies has become a core issue in national governance. Existing studies mostly focus on qualitative interpretation of such policies, lacking systematic quantitative evaluation of their internal structure and overall quality. To fill this gap, this paper constructs an evaluation index system with 9 first level and 40 second-level variables based on the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index model and conducts a quantitative empirical analysis on 15 representative national and local elderly care policies in China through binary scoring, PMC index calculation and three-dimensional surface chart visualization. The results show that the average PMC index of the sample policies is 0.6462, indicating an overall moderate level. The sample policies perform well in policy function, tools and content, while policy guarantee, time validity and administrative level are the key shortcomings. On this basis, this paper puts forward targeted optimization paths for China's elderly care policy system, providing quantitative empirical support for the improvement of elderly care service policies and a methodological reference for quantitative policy text analysis.</p> 2026-04-10T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Open Access Public Health and Health Administration Review